Political thought can be influenced by intentional language manipulation.
You might think that I sound a little like a conspiracy theorist! How on earth could anyone influence your politics with language? Allow me to explain with a small thought experiment.
Imagine a jungle spider.
What springs to mind? Something large, perhaps terrifying? Parhaps something that spins a huge web.
Now imagine a rainforest spider.
Did you imagine this spider to be any different? Perhaps smaller, more colourful, and less imposing?
Can you name the difference between a jungle and a rainforest?
Within the last few decades, environmentalism has become a key political issue. The jungle can be a scary place. Wouldn’t you rather save the rainforest?
Perhaps you think that ‘those in charge’ are unconcerned with intentional use of words and phrasing to influence political thought. Who do you think of when you hear the phrase ‘The Princess Of Wales’ ? Why do we have a ‘War On Terror’ and not a ‘War Of Terror’ ?
Feminism also adopts strange tactics when explaining foundational concepts. Have you ever heard of reverse sexism? If you think about this phrase for a moment, you may notice that it sounds a little awkward – as if someone had designed it.
The idea behind the phrase ‘reverse sexism’ is that it represents sexism directed at men, whilst intimating that this is unusual.
What was wrong with the word we had already, just plain ‘sexism’ ?
This language manipulation is used frequently by feminists , for example in the formation of organisations like Men Can Stop Rape (intimation: ‘only men rape’ ).
Have you ever stopped to ask yourself the real difference between ‘positive discrimination’ and ‘sexual discrimination’ ? The former is policy, yet the latter illegal. However, they amount to the same thing – favouring one sex over another!
Here are a few more examples. Have you ever noticed that the severe, clunky sounding non-gender specific word Homemaker has superceded the now archaic term Housewife ?
Why do we hear of ‘deadbeat’ dads – but not moms ?
Why do we now hear of ‘single’ rather than ‘unmarried’ mothers ?
Why do we have ‘family courts’ and not ‘divorce courts’ ?
Why do we now hear of ‘single parent families’ rather than ‘broken homes’ ?
Why do the BBC, who are legally required to be impartial, self-justify their heterosexual gynocentric bias in discusssion of domestic abuse ?
Why is it that the English ‘Minister For Equality’ favours legislation that promotes inequality ?
What do these words and phrases have in common? Each one is fundamentally anti-male and anti-nuclear family , and widely used by feminist approved media and government. This is clearly no coincidence.
Feminism purports to concern itself only with equality – but in reality propagates mistrust, tension and hatred between the sexes.
~o0o~
Suggested further reading;-
‘The Origins Of Political Correctness‘ by Bill Lind
‘Feminism and The English Language‘ by David Gelernter
8 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 20, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Coffee Catholic
Huh! I’m no “homemaker”. I’m a HOUSEWIFE and the Feminists can put that in their pipe and smoke it!
February 4, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Anonymous
This is a great post.
Language definitely carries the power to shape societies. That’s why minorities & women started calling attention to it & insisting on some changes to terminology that worked very well to suppress them.
You clearly don’t like it when it works against white guys.
January 13, 2012 at 5:08 am
John Keevins
How does that hold any water whatsoever?
Do two wrongs make a right, is that your basic argument?
October 12, 2009 at 10:05 am
Exposing Feminism
Anonymous,
What makes you think that I am white? Perhaps you have unwittingly revealed some bigotry on your part..
You also reveal that you agree that this language manipulation was planned?
Can you give examples of the opression that women suffer by being referred to as “housewives” 😉 – or perhaps you are simply repeating what you are indoctrinated into thinking by your women’s studies class?
Time and time again, we see the same pattern from feminists..
Dissemination of fictitious victimology with the intent of assuming social power.
E F
“Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession… The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family- maker is a choice that shouldn’t be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that.”
Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, The Daily Illini, April 25, 1981.
January 27, 2011 at 10:28 pm
Human-Stupidity.com
I have been writing extensively on feminist language manipulation, but more focused on domestic violence, rape, prostitution, so called “child porn” (which usually is adolescent erotica) etc. These topics were so successfully shamed by feminists, that even most men’s sites shun me for daring to choose such topics.
http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/social-rules-habits/manipulate-language
October 8, 2011 at 9:45 am
SubAltern
I don’t think anyone can reasonably deny that the Feminism movement has it’s issues. It’s reactionary and ideological, But it came from rage, trauma and a realization that one was trapped and that there were alternatives that were denied by a system that defended a set of social imaginaries for the sake of those at it’s very top. I believe it is fantasy driven but what has the slave got to guide her/him but fantasies of freedom? The subtext of your project seems to be that there is something wrong with the pressure feminists bring to bear, through the careful use of language, on the status quo. The status quo was due for a shellacking.
Those who work for freedom work for the freedom for all. Some of them are man-haters for sure, but not all and not all wordage from feminism is invalidated by it. Everybody hates somebody sometime. Everyone manipulates with language too. It’s unpleasant, however, thus progresses the dialectic.
August 23, 2015 at 6:24 pm
sgb
your quote ‘Feminism purports to concern itself only with equality – but in reality propagates mistrust, tension and hatred between the sexes.’ actually because of mistrust, tension and hatred cropped up and then gave rise to feminism
August 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm
sgb
feminism is not anti man or man-hate. men or people or society has misquoted it for their own convenience. if women are other half then how an other half be neglected or not given nourishment.